47 terms, one definition each in plain English, plus why it actually matters when you're negotiating. Jump to any term:
Non-Disclosure Agreement terms
Compelled Disclosure
If a court or regulator forces a party to hand over confidential information, doing so is not a breach, but the party must give warning where it can, cooperate in resisting the disclosure, and disclose no more than required.
Why it matters: Legal compulsion can happen regardless of what the NDA says. This section manages how it happens rather than pretending it cannot.
Definition of Confidential Information
This defines what counts as "confidential" under the agreement. In the mutual form, every party is protected when it discloses and bound when it receives; in the one-way form, only one party's information is protected.
Why it matters: The definition sets the boundary of the entire agreement, information outside it is not protected. Definitions that are too narrow leave disclosures unprotected; definitions with no boundary at all can be harder to enforce.
Exclusions from Confidential Information
These are the standard carve-outs, information that is already public, already known, received from someone else with clean hands, or developed independently is not treated as confidential.
Why it matters: Without these exclusions, a party could be restricted from using information it already had or that anyone can find publicly. These four carve-outs appear in substantially this form in the vast majority of commercial NDAs.
No License or Transfer of Rights
Sharing information does not transfer ownership of it or grant any rights to use the discloser's intellectual property beyond the discussions themselves.
Why it matters: This prevents a later argument that access to the information implied a broader right to use it. It is a short section that closes a meaningful gap.
No Obligation to Proceed
Signing the NDA does not commit anyone to doing a deal, either side can walk away from the discussions, and no one is vouching for the accuracy of the information shared at this stage.
Why it matters: This keeps the NDA doing exactly one job, protecting information, and prevents it from being read as an agreement to transact. The disclaimer of accuracy protects disclosing parties sharing early-stage projections.
No Representation as to Accuracy
Early-stage information is shared as-is. Nobody is vouching for its accuracy at this stage; formal promises about the business come later, in the definitive agreement, after real diligence.
Why it matters: Courts have enforced exactly this language to bar claims by a disappointed party over information received during diligence. For a disclosing party sharing projections and drafts, it is significant protection; for a receiving party, it is the reason diligence and final representations matter.
No Reverse Engineering
If software, prototypes, samples, or devices change hands during the discussions, this stops the other side from taking them apart to learn how they work.
Why it matters: In both Canada and the United States, reverse engineering a lawfully obtained product is a legally permitted way to discover its secrets unless a contract says otherwise. When physical or digital artifacts are shared, this section closes that door.
Non-Solicitation
While the parties are talking (and for a set period after), neither side may poach the people they met through the discussions. Ordinary public job postings remain fine.
Why it matters: Deal discussions expose each side's key people. This section is commonly included when discussions involve meeting the other side's team, such as in acquisition due diligence.
Notice of Immunity Under the Defend Trade Secrets Act
US federal law protects whistleblowers who disclose trade secrets to the government or a lawyer to report suspected lawbreaking. This section is the legally required notice of that protection.
Why it matters: Under the Defend Trade Secrets Act, an agreement governing trade secrets that involves individuals and omits this notice costs the trade secret owner access to enhanced remedies (double damages and legal fees) in a federal trade secret action. Including it costs nothing.
Notice of Unauthorized Disclosure
If the information leaks or goes missing, the party that lost it must say so quickly and help contain the damage, rather than staying quiet.
Why it matters: Speed is what limits harm from a leak. Without a notice obligation, a disclosing party may learn about a breach only when the damage surfaces publicly.
Obligations of the Receiving Party
The receiving party must keep the information secret, use it only for the stated purpose, share it internally only with people who genuinely need it, and answer for its own people's conduct.
Why it matters: This is the operative heart of the NDA. The "Purpose" limitation is doing real work, it prevents information shared for one discussion from being used for something else, such as competing.
Personal Information
Employee, customer, and supplier records shared during a deal contain personal information about real people. This section sets the special handling rules that Canadian privacy law expects for it.
Why it matters: Canadian privacy law permits deal parties to share personal information without individual consent only where an agreement with these safeguards is in place before disclosure happens. Putting these obligations only in the final purchase agreement is a common error, because it is the NDA that is in force when the data room opens.
Remedies
If confidential information is about to leak, money after the fact may not fix it, so the parties agree the discloser can ask a court to stop the breach directly.
Why it matters: Courts decide whether to grant injunctions, but this acknowledgment strengthens the discloser's position when speed matters most. It is standard in commercial NDAs.
Return or Destruction of Confidential Information
When the discussions end (or on request), the receiving party gives back or deletes the information, with narrow practical carve-outs for legal record-keeping and automatic backups.
Why it matters: Without this, confidential material can sit in the other party's systems indefinitely after a deal falls through. The backup and legal-retention carve-outs reflect how modern IT systems actually work.
Term
The confidentiality obligations last a fixed number of years, and trade secrets stay protected for as long as they remain trade secrets.
Why it matters: An NDA with no stated duration invites disputes about when the obligations end. Fixed terms of two to five years are common in commercial discussions; the trade-secret tail is a standard companion.
Memorandum of Understanding terms
Coordination and Governance
Each party names a point person, the point people meet regularly, and disagreements go to them first. The committee coordinates; it cannot sign anything for anyone.
Why it matters: With three or four parties, cooperation fails from coordination gaps more often than from bad faith. A named forum with a regular cadence is the difference between an MOU that drives work and one that sits in a drawer.
Costs and Expenses
Everyone pays their own way, lawyers, accountants, travel, whether or not the deal happens.
Why it matters: Without this, a party that spends heavily on an exploration that collapses sometimes tries to recover costs from the other side. Stating the rule up front removes the argument.
Exclusivity
For a set window, neither side shops the same opportunity to others. This is one of the few sections of an MOU that is typically made binding.
Why it matters: Exploring a cooperation takes real time and money. An exclusivity window protects that investment. Because it restricts real behavior, it only works if it is binding, which is why it is carved out from the non-binding framework.
Intellectual Property
What each party brings stays theirs, nobody gets a license by accident, and anything built together is parked until the real agreement decides who owns it.
Why it matters: Collaborations often start producing materials before any definitive agreement exists. When an MOU is silent on this, default legal rules can produce messy joint ownership of whatever was created, which is far harder to untangle later than to prevent now.
Non-Binding Nature
The MOU as a whole records intentions, not commitments, but a short, named list of sections (confidentiality, exclusivity, costs, governing law, disputes) is fully binding.
Why it matters: This is the single most important section of an MOU. Documents that are silent or ambiguous about what is binding generate exactly the disputes an MOU exists to avoid, courts in some jurisdictions have found "agreements to agree" enforceable based on the parties' conduct.
Publicity
Nobody announces the cooperation, posts about it, or uses the other side's logo without everyone's sign-off.
Why it matters: Public statements are how non-binding intentions turn into binding problems. Courts weighing whether parties intended to be bound look hard at conduct, and announcing a deal is among the most damaging conduct there is. This section also protects each party's brand while the cooperation is still tentative.
Purpose and Background
This states, in a sentence or two, what the parties are exploring together and frames the MOU as a record of intentions rather than a final deal.
Why it matters: A clear statement of purpose anchors every other section. Vague purpose language is one of the most common weaknesses in informally drafted MOUs, it leaves each side with a different picture of what was agreed.
Relationship of the Parties
Cooperating on a project does not make the parties legal partners, and nobody can sign deals or take on debts in another party's name.
Why it matters: Partnership law in Canada and the United States can treat parties as partners based on how they behave, regardless of labels. Being deemed a partner brings shared liability for the other party's obligations. An MOU describing cooperation and contributions is exactly the fact pattern where this arises, which is why the disclaimer is standard.
Roles and Contributions
Who brings what, money, people, technology, facilities, relationships, written down while everyone still remembers agreeing to it.
Why it matters: Undocumented assumptions about who contributes what are among the most common sources of partnership disputes. Recording them early, even non-bindingly, surfaces mismatched expectations before they become expensive.
Scope of Cooperation
This lists the specific areas the parties will work on together and commits them to a regular cadence of check-ins.
Why it matters: The scope section is where an MOU earns its keep, it converts a handshake into a shared, written list of workstreams that both sides can point to.
Term and Termination
The MOU has a natural shelf life, it ends when a real agreement is signed, when the clock runs out, or when any party gives notice. The binding sections keep operating after it ends.
Why it matters: MOUs without an end date linger indefinitely and create ambiguity about whether the parties are still "in discussions". The survival language prevents termination from accidentally switching off confidentiality.
Letter of Intent terms
Binding and Non-Binding Provisions
The deal terms (price, structure, conditions) are stated intentions, not commitments. A short, named list of process protections, exclusivity, confidentiality, expenses, and similar, is fully binding.
Why it matters: This is the most consequential section of an LOI. Ambiguity about binding effect has produced significant litigation, in some cases parties have been held to a deal they believed was still preliminary, based on an LOI plus their conduct.
Brokers and Finders
If anyone hired a broker or finder, they say so now, and whoever hired them pays them.
Why it matters: Business brokers are common in private sales, and surprise fee claims from intermediaries after closing are a recurring dispute. A one sentence representation now prevents an expensive argument later.
Conditions to Closing
The checklist of things that must happen before the deal actually closes, final contracts, clean diligence, required consents, and (if included) the buyer's financing coming through.
Why it matters: Conditions define who bears which risks between signing and closing. A financing condition, in particular, shifts financing risk to the seller, sellers commonly resist it or demand proof of committed funds.
Conduct of Business
The seller agrees to keep running the business normally while the deal is in progress, no selling off assets, taking on unusual debt, or making big changes without asking the buyer first.
Why it matters: The buyer is pricing the business as it stands at signing. This section protects against the business the buyer diligenced being materially different from the business delivered at closing.
Deposit
The buyer puts money down, held by a neutral third party, showing they are serious. The key business question is what happens to it if the deal dies, and the answer usually depends on why it died.
Why it matters: Deposit language that does not clearly state when the deposit is refundable is one of the most common sources of post-collapse disputes in private transactions.
Due Diligence
The buyer gets a defined window to look under the hood, financials, contracts, operations, and can walk away if it does not like what it finds.
Why it matters: The diligence period defines the deal's tempo. Sellers want it short to limit disruption and uncertainty; buyers want enough time to actually complete the work.
Exclusivity
While the buyer spends money on diligence and lawyers, the seller agrees not to shop the deal to anyone else, and to tell the buyer if someone else comes knocking.
Why it matters: Exclusivity is frequently the buyer's main reason for signing an LOI at all. Acquisition LOIs commonly include one; a buyer proceeding without it is spending diligence money with no protection against being outbid mid-process.
Expenses
Everyone pays their own advisers, whether the deal closes or collapses.
Why it matters: Diligence and legal costs on an acquisition are significant. Agreeing the rule up front prevents cost-recovery claims when a deal falls apart.
Key Employees
If the business depends on specific people, the deal expects them to sign on before closing, and the Buyer states its current intentions for the wider team.
Why it matters: Deals die late and expensively when key-person requirements surface for the first time in the definitive agreement. Naming the people early means the conversation with them happens on a sensible timeline. The workforce-intentions statement also matters to founder sellers deciding between offers.
Limitation of Remedies
If the deal never happens, neither side can sue the other for the value of the deal they hoped to get. Real breaches of the binding rules are compensated by actual costs spent, and leaks or exclusivity violations can still be stopped by a court directly.
Why it matters: Courts in some jurisdictions have awarded a disappointed party the full expected value of a transaction that was never signed, where a preliminary agreement left duties and remedies open. One well known Delaware case produced a nine figure award on that basis. This section is the countermeasure: it caps what a failed negotiation can cost while keeping the protections that matter enforceable.
Non-Reliance
Information shared before the final agreement comes as-is. The promises the Buyer can rely on are the ones written into the Definitive Agreement, which is exactly where diligence findings get negotiated into protections.
Why it matters: Courts have enforced this exact language to shut down claims by buyers over information received during a deal process that later collapsed. Sellers sharing projections need it; buyers should understand it means the Definitive Agreement's representations are where their protection lives.
Non-Solicitation of Employees
If the deal falls apart, the Buyer cannot spend the next year hiring away the people they met during diligence. Ordinary job postings stay fine.
Why it matters: Diligence exposes the Seller's team to the Buyer. For a Seller, the scenario where the deal dies and the would-be buyer walks away with two key employees instead is a real and common fear; this section is the protection against it.
Principal Commercial Terms
The heart of the deal in plain terms: who provides what, who pays what, where, and for how long, stated as intentions rather than commitments.
Why it matters: A Letter of Intent that never states the commercial terms rarely moves a negotiation forward, because the parties have not yet seen the same deal written down. Stating them as intentions surfaces disagreements early, while they are still cheap to resolve.
Proposed Transaction
This names the buyer, the seller, what is being bought, and the currently intended structure, while flagging that the structure can change once advisers weigh in.
Why it matters: Whether a deal is a share purchase or an asset purchase changes tax treatment, what liabilities transfer, and which consents are needed. Stating the current intention while reserving flexibility is the standard approach at the LOI stage.
Publicity
No press releases, no announcements, no telling the industry the deal is happening, until both sides agree it is time.
Why it matters: Announcing a deal before it is signed is dangerous twice over. It can destabilize the target's employees, customers, and suppliers, and courts deciding whether a preliminary document became binding weigh the parties' public conduct heavily. One famous US case turned in part on a press release announcing an agreement in principle.
Purchase Price and Payment
The headline number and how it gets paid, cash at closing, holdbacks, seller financing, earn-outs, plus a flag that the number can move if due diligence turns up surprises.
Why it matters: Payment mechanics matter as much as the headline price. A price paid entirely at closing and the same price paid half in earn-out are very different deals for both sides.
Termination
The LOI has a built-in expiry date and either side can end it earlier, but ending it does not switch off the binding protections like confidentiality, and does not erase a breach that already happened.
Why it matters: Without a termination mechanism, an LOI can hang over both parties indefinitely, a seller unsure whether they can re-engage the market, a buyer unsure whether exclusivity still runs.
Terms common to all three
Confidentiality
The parties agree to keep the discussions, and this document itself, confidential. If a separate NDA already exists between the parties, this section points to it instead of restating the obligations.
Why it matters: Deal discussions frequently involve sensitive information well before any binding agreement is signed. Where a separate NDA exists, referencing it avoids two overlapping and potentially inconsistent sets of confidentiality obligations.
Counterparts and Electronic Signatures
Each party can sign a separate copy, including electronically, and all the signed copies together count as one document.
Why it matters: This is what lets parties in different places sign the same document without couriering paper around. It is standard in modern commercial documents.
Dispute Resolution
This sets out where and how disagreements will be resolved, in the courts of a named place, or through private arbitration.
Why it matters: Deciding the forum in advance avoids a dispute about where to have the dispute. Arbitration is private and can be faster; courts are public and produce appealable decisions. Both approaches are common.
Governing Law
This names the set of laws that will be used to interpret the document if a question or dispute ever comes up.
Why it matters: Without a stated governing law, the parties can end up disputing which jurisdiction's rules apply before they can even address the actual disagreement. It is one of the most commonly missing provisions in informally drafted documents.
These are the exact clauses DealDocs assembles into your document, explained the same way in the app.
Start your document free